commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33949] - [pool] genericKeyedObjectPool.borrowObject() calls activateObject in synchronized mode
Date Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:03:50 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33949>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33949


Sandy@McArthur.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         OS/Version|FreeBSD                     |All
           Priority|P2                          |P4




------- Additional Comments From Sandy@McArthur.org  2006-02-10 23:03 -------
The problem with this is the obivious solution, narrowing the amount
synchronized code could create at leate one race condition which will require a
non-trivial amount of though (for me at least) to make sure it's done correctly.
Also, this could break the recent syncronization fixes found by Mayur Naik, see
Bug #37234.

* What the side effects of changing activeCount in a different syncrhonization
context that the previously idle object was removed from the idle object pool?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message