commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Grégory Joseph <joseph.greg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jelly] Releases of jelly and jelly-tags-xml ?
Date Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:38:06 GMT
Hi Paul,
On 20/01/06, Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org> wrote:
> There's at least a major issue to be solved before a release of jelly
> and jelly-xml: Gump testing, including the usage of the latest jexl as
> well as hope for a release of jaxen.
>
> The problems is that many unit-tests currently fail because jexl now
> handles correctly primitive types but then may be wrong add doing
> equality of expressions using primitive number types.
>
> As for jaxen, the problem is just that we wish to be using... a release.
>

Thanks for the status. Sounds like a long chain of release-waiting...
do you guys have any idea on the release plans of jexl and jaxen ?

> Finally, for jelly-1.1, there's this large wish for a more
> understandable tag-caching which we just haven't done yet... but that
> could be, maybe, unfortunately, delayed to or 2.0...

I'd be in favor of delaying that indeed ;-)

Cheers,

greg


> Diogo Quintela (EF) wrote:
> > I back you up Greg.
> > Indeed, we are only using those because of core/xml related changes (xml
> > pipeline / xml namespace) introduced to support those xsd declarations
> > (but are by far more than that)
> >
> > Paul Libbrecht has worked on those
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213
> >
> > Regarding releasing as RC, I am +1 on this, but after-all, that's only my
> > silent vote :-)
> >
> > Regards
> > Diogo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> Hi list,
> >>
> >> As recently and quickly discussed on irc with Dion, I was wondering if
> >> there would be any possible plans for releasing jelly and
> >> jelly-tags-xml. I'm writing as one of the xdoclet2 developers: we
> >> currently depend on post-1.0 snapshots of both of -core and -tags-xml,
> >> and, as you might guess, we'd very much like to switch back to stable
> >> releases.
> >>
> >> As far as I can tell, the only reason we use these versions is because
> >> they added support for xsd declarations in generated xml documents.
> >> (And xdoclet2 has plugins to generate j2ee descriptors which require
> >> an xsd declaration)
> >>
> >> Of course we'd be very keen on testing any RC, and our test codebase
> >> might help in that respect.
> >>
> >> Does this sound feasible / would anyone be interested in pushing this out
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> greg
> >>
> >>
> >> ps: the snapshots we currently use are actually timestamped versions:
> >> commons-jelly-20050813.225330 & commons-jelly-tags-xml-20050823.222913
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message