commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <p...@activemath.org>
Subject Re: [all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)
Date Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:26:49 GMT
You definitely need to send such a wish to the general xml list at least.
Note also much w3c interaction can be done without membership...

paul

Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <tobrien@discursive.com> wrote:
> <snip/>
>   
>> ...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF to join
the W3C, but
>> we're currently not a Member organization.
>>     
> <snap/>
>
> FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is
> an example where we're beginning to see useful interactions between
> the ASF and the W3C, and IMO, the ASF can only gain by being a W3C
> member.
>
> If we stare at the W3C member list ...
>
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Member/List
>
> ... we see members such as:
>
>  * OASIS
>  * Mozilla
>
> and it is probably time to float this thought at the ASF.
>
> So, a couple of questions:
>
>  * Anyone else has any views on this?
>  * What would be the appropriate ASF forum to begin this conversation?
>
> -Rahul
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message