commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andy McBride" <>
Subject RE: [logging] log4j transition
Date Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:34:08 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Kitching []
> Sent: 20 January 2006 00:05
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
> Subject: RE: [logging] log4j transition
> From memory the problem is the inverting of the Priority and Level
> classes. In 1.2, Priority extends Level while in 1.3 Level was to extend
> Priority or somesuch. This works in a compatible manner for most
> methods, but not the Logger.log(FQDN, level, msg, t) method - which JCL
> uses. That's from memory many months old now, so may not be 100%
> correct.

I think a couple weeks ago Level was 'restored' to extend Priority whereas
it had been made a top level class before so maybe the problem has gone

> I discussed this issue with them last year and they were determined to
> push on with their plan. They do have to get rid of the old stuff
> eventually, but it's very interesting that they are now considering
> holding off on that until a 2.0 release. I'll try to find time to talk
> to them about that but I don't think it affects the proposed JCL 1.1
> release.

No affect on JCL 1.1 at all, +1 to that. 

Just hopeful that you won't need a 1.1.x release of JCL just to support
log4j1.3 when it is released :-)



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message