commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andy McBride" <>
Subject RE: [logging] log4j transition
Date Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:27:46 GMT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Kitching []
> Sent: 19 January 2006 05:31
> The name-change will break any config files that explicitly specify that
> logger name. That breakage will have to occur eventually as long as the
> log4j team keep to their plan of making a binary-incompatible release.

The log4j team now appear intent on restoring binary compatibility in the
1.3 codebase and are attempting to defer breaking changes to a later 2.0

> However I think we've got enough in this release without buying into
> that issue too. In addition, I hate guessing the future on this; if we
> release a Log4J13Logger class and then it doesn't work with the real
> log4j13 that would be embarrassing.
> Any objections to reverting to the old naming and removing Log4J13Logger
> for now? [NB: I wrote it :-].


I'm not sure which incompatible changes in log4j forced you to implement the
Log4J13Logger class but I wondered if they could now be resolved there,
negating any future problem with using JCL1.1.x with log4j1.3 ? 



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message