commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38152] - [resources] Correct package name of original struts classes
Date Fri, 06 Jan 2006 01:22:36 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38152





------- Additional Comments From chris@absolutegiganten.org  2006-01-06 02:22 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Well, technically these changes are incorrect, since the packages were correct 
> at the time the derivation happened. I'm not even sure if this is worth doing, 
> but for the changes to make sense, you'd also have to dig up the corresponding 
> Subversion revision number, since the revision numbers there now are not useful.
> 
> Personally, I'd be tempted to just leave it as is.

Actually I did some research in the struts svn repo and I couldn't find any clue
that struts did put classes in org.apache.http.action at some point. At least in
the released trees ActionMessage was always in o.a.s.action. Just curious: from
which tree were the classes derived ?

IMHO now that the revision number connection is lost we should get rid of the
derivation info altogether. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message