Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32556 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2005 22:25:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2005 22:25:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 96678 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2005 22:25:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 96350 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2005 22:25:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 96334 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2005 22:25:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:25:05 -0800 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 69C0BCB; Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:24:44 +0100 (CET) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37985] - unit tests fail for commons-net-1.4.1 with NullPointerException In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20051221222444.69C0BCB@ajax.apache.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 23:24:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37985 ------- Additional Comments From dfs@apache.org 2005-12-21 23:24 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This patch solves the problem. I'm going to go ahead with packaging 1.4.1 using > this patch, unless there's some overwhelming reason not to. I don't mean to speak for the rest of the Commons Net developers, but I think we'd rather you package it by bypassing the unit tests during packaging. Applying your patch may cause more bug reports from people who call disconnect() improperly. With the patch, they'll have no indication they did something wrong. We can discuss this further on commons-dev. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org