Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ryan@theheatonhome.com
 designates 66.29.144.154 as permitted sender)
Message-Id: <200512201625.jBKGPxPQ013889@base.theheatonhome.com>
From: "Ryan Heaton" <ryan@theheatonhome.com>
To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>,
        <paul@activemath.org>
Subject: RE: [jelly][vote] APT tag library
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 09:25:56 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <43A7219C.90401@activemath.org>
Thread-Index: AcYE4J7My993haswQsOeRY8uEP/OGgAoTchQ

That sounds great.  How do I get a jira account so I can add a component? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org] 
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:10 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library
> 
> Ryan,
> 
> The idea of making it a jira issue is that it's a place you can post 
> to... and that people can see and comment on.
> I'd put there a tag-library similarly packaged to others in 
> jelly/jelly-tags/.
> 
> How does it sound ?
> 
> paul
> 
> Ryan Heaton wrote:
> > I have not posted a jira issue.  I was not aware that was needed.
> >
> > You'll have to be patient with me, I really have no idea 
> how the process to add a component works.  I would be happy to proceed
> > through whatever formal process has been established.  If 
> someone could explain to me what needs to happen, I'd be 
> happy to drive
> > it.
> >
> > I don't even mind if the component isn't wanted in the 
> commons, I'll put it in sourceforge otherwise.  From where I 
> stand, I've got
> > something cool, I believe it will be very useful to many 
> people, and if you want it as part of jelly, I'm willing to 
> submit it and
> > even to maintain it.
> >
> > Please advise.
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:paul@activemath.org] 
> >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:17 AM
> >> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> >> Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library
> >>
> >> I'm slowly catching up on this.
> >> Maybe we need to have life with Ryan a bit longer before 
> becoming a 
> >> committer.
> >> In order to send a fully fledged component proposal, Ryan, 
> dare I ask 
> >> whether you've posted a jira issue already ?
> >> This is really needed for all to look at.
> >>
> >> thanks
> >>
> >> paul
> >>
> >> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >>     
> >>> On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:48 -0700, Ryan Heaton wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> I'm adjusting the thread subject to reflect the fact that 
> >>>>         
> >> there is a vote going on for two things:
> >>     
> >>>> 1. Acceptance of the new APT tag library (described below)
> >>>> 2. Acceptance of me as a committer to support the new apt 
> >>>>         
> >> tag library, if it gets accepted.
> >>     
> >>>> So far, I have recorded three people voting positive for 
> >>>>         
> >> both proposals:
> >>     
> >>>> Dion Gillard
> >>>> Hans Gilde
> >>>> Paul Libbrecht
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> hi ryan
> >>>
> >>> (sorry to have to start being a little legalistic...)
> >>>
> >>> i know that this can be a little confusing but there are votes and
> >>> VOTEs...
> >>>
> >>> both of these need to be official ASF votes. these need 
> >>>       
> >> more formality
> >>     
> >>> that just vague +1's against your proposal. the subject 
> >>>       
> >> should be [VOTE]
> >>     
> >>> (jelly isn't necessary since VOTEs are commons-wide and may 
> >>>       
> >> result in
> >>     
> >>> some filters not recognising your post as a vote thread). 
> >>>
> >>> we're really only getting up to speed with the new processes for
> >>> accepting code which is not original so you might need a little
> >>> patience. so, apologies in advance...
> >>>
> >>> i'm not sure there's any consensus about the best way to approach
> >>> software grants but i'd expect to understand the provinence of the
> >>> donated code before i'd be willing to +1. i'd also expect a jelly
> >>> committer to start the VOTE thread.
> >>>
> >>> it's not really possible to have conditional approval for a 
> >>>       
> >> committer
> >>     
> >>> and it's poor netiquette to nominate yourself as a committer. 
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org