commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Libbrecht <>
Subject Re: [jelly] Gump failures
Date Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:21:28 GMT
Brett Porter wrote:
> It was intentionally breaking, I think. I was told that it tightening 
> up conformance. Others are welcome to pursue it further, this isn't 
> really my realm of expertise.
Brett, would you have a copy of the mails ?
Such a strengthening would be related to a reported non-conformance 
issue, or?
> I agree. It should be fixed at either the Jelly or Jaxen end, but if 
> nobody is stepping up to do so (and I certainly can't), then turn off 
> the nags and put it in jira would be my vote.
Maybe I find time to hit this...


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message