commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Yandell <>
Subject Re: Checking Release Candidates - Wiki Page
Date Thu, 08 Dec 2005 05:07:43 GMT
It's definitely arguable that we shouldn't have Simian turned on in
our source releases, or even in SVN. While we are able to use it, our
users may not be able to.

Assuming that Redhill's licensing for open source is just a free
version of their commercial license
then the Maven plugin would seem to be in breach of it too. The
license is non-sublicenseable/non-transferrable.

This makes it much like Jira, which while we can use it as much as we
want on our own servers, and publish the output, we can't distribute
it under the ASL licence.

So I'd recommend that we don't have it listed as a report in Commons components.


On 12/7/05, Niall Pemberton <> wrote:
> I included that because Robert indicated it was required and Stephen
> voted -1 in the recent Configuration release vote because of it:
> Personally I found the site unclear whether we were required to actually
> "apply" for one of the free licenses or not, but if people are going to -1 a
> release on that basis, seemed like a good idea to put it in the check list.
> Hopefully they'll jump in and answer you properly :-)
> I think the same was the case for Validator - the recent 1.2.0 release went
> out with it in, but I hadn't seen it raised as an issue at that point.
> Niall
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Cooper" <>
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2005 3:26 AM
> On 12/7/05, Niall Pemberton <> wrote:
> >
> > I started a page on the wiki with notes for checking a release candidate:
> >
> >
> Excellent!
> One question, though: I don't understand the part about ensuring that the
> component has a license for Simian. The referenced page on the Simian site
> says it's free for open source use. Is there something else we're expected
> to do?
> Frankly, what it produces doesn't seem too useful, but I have it in
> FileUpload because I picked up the line from some other project.xml. If
> there's more work involved, then I'm probably more likely to simply remove
> it.
> --
> Martin Cooper
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message