commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35258] - [collections] TreeList Collections.binarySearch problem - general remove() after previous() problem
Date Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:45:09 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35258>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35258


trim@atlas.cz changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #17186|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Additional Comments From trim@atlas.cz  2005-12-11 13:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=17194)
 --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17194&action=view)
Test case for  a bug 35258 version 2.0

It was a good idea to use seeded random generator for Collections.shuffle(). So
i was able to find much more suitable test case. This test case has TreeList
size only 5 nodes and the point of inconsistece of listIterator is known too.
It can be much more easy to solve that bug with this test case than with
previous one.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message