Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37152]  -
    [configuration] Fake "resources" dependency kills Maven2
Message-Id: <20051102134127.443DF5BA@ajax.apache.org>
Date: Wed,  2 Nov 2005 14:41:27 +0100 (CET)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37152>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37152


------- Additional Comments From oliver.heger@t-online.de  2005-11-02 14:41 -------
Here is another, more radical approach.

I checked again the test cases that make use of this resources.jar and came to
the following result: From configuration's point of view it does not matter
whether a configuration file is loaded from a jar or elsewhere from the class
path. In both cases it is simply dealt with a URL (which of course looks
different). So what we test here is not in the first line our implementation,
but the Java runtime's ability to handle different types of URLs transparently.
The affected test cases do not contribute to the code coverage of our test suite.

So IMHO we could simply remove these tests, thus getting rid of the faked
dependency at all. Other opinions?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org