Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58711 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2005 12:42:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2005 12:42:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 91167 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2005 12:42:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90840 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2005 12:42:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90829 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2005 12:42:04 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:42:03 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id BEA00237; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:41:38 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37086] - [math] Complex arithmetic operations do not conform to C99x Annex G X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20051014124138.BEA00237@ajax.apache.org> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:41:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37086 ------- Additional Comments From phil@steitz.com 2005-10-14 14:41 ------- The minimum requirement is that the javadoc fully specify implemented behavior, which in the case of 1.0 implementations of complex arithmetic and equals, it does not. We discussed earlier using C99x Annex G as a guide (similarly to what some other Java Complex implementations do and similarly to how we have tried to follow 454 for double arithmetic), for the conisistency reasons mentioned above. Lack of public availability of the spec is an inconvenience; but that does not prevent us making our impls consistent with it. The key is to fully document in our javadoc what the behavior that we are implementing is. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org