Brett Porter wrote:
> Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
>
>>If not, then I will just release 3.2 with extra debugging and warning
>>notes, which is not good for our reputation.
>
>
> Is it isolated to changes in LRUMap? I mean, can those reproducing it
> rollback to 3.1's (or near enough) LRUMap and it goes away? If so, that
> could be a way to get to 3.2.
There is no evidence that we introduced this since 3.1. I believe it has
been there since class creation in 3.0 (or alternatively that there is
in fact no problem at all)
> I don't know about releasing such a version with debugging and a known
> regression. perhaps labelled 3.2-beta with the extra debugging info to
> try and track it down?
I've uploaded a jar to bugzilla with debugging.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|