commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Dudziak <tom...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [all] Mock Objects Implementation...
Date Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:27:57 GMT
On 10/13/05, robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:38 -0400, James Carman wrote:
>
> > Is there a "standard" mock objects implementation that we are supposed to
> > use?
>
> i'm not sure that we're really into this kind of 'standards': but it is
> worth asking the community if they have any preferences (and why)...
>
> > I like both EasyMock and JMock, but I'm starting to lean more towards
> > JMock for readability.  Any thoughts
>
> only one: both have compatible licenses :)

you might want to have a look at this article, it also contains some
discussion of the differences between EasyMock and JMock:

http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/mocksArentStubs.html

Tom

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message