commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37153] - [pool] patch to use non-deprecated CursorableLinkedList from Collections
Date Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:52:16 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37153>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37153





------- Additional Comments From rdonkin@apache.org  2005-10-29 12:52 -------
There's a strong argument for breaking the dependency on collections altogether.
Dependencies cause problems for deep libraries and should really be minimized.
One reason is the troubles caused when two deep libraries require differnt
versions of a shared dependency. Another is to reduce the minimum size of download.

I know that this is counter-intuitive but deep libraries are different from
application code, frameworks and shallow libraries.

The only collections class that is required is CursorableLinkedList. I've been
thinking of ways to use some fancy footwork to include a repackaged version of
the current released collections version. Alternatively, could just fork the
source. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message