commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "James Carman" <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Moving Proxy to Commons Proper
Date Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:33:11 GMT
Robert,

 

Thank you for your feedback (finally somebody said *something*).  I made
this a vote based on the instructions found at
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN.  Maybe
we should update that WIKI to suggest making a proposal first and then
starting a vote if there are no objections.  I really just wanted to know if
there were any technical objections to having proxy move into the commons
proper so that I could fix the problems.  I would really like to see this
become a full-fledged commons component.  I think it's a very useful idea
and a pretty intuitive API.

 

As for your suggestion to cut a release candidate now, I like it.  I do
think that I need some simple tutorials/examples on the site before it's
ready for a real release, so I'll try to take care of that sometime soon.
Then, I'll cut a release candidate, per your suggestion.  I will try to
follow the directions found at
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html to prepare the
release candidate, but I'm probably bound to make mistakes as I'm new to
this project management stuff.  I'll probably have a few questions along the
way too! 

 

Also, I would still like to hear if anyone else has any suggestions for
things that I need to take care of before they would consider it ready for
release.  Resolving the 1.5 dependency helped of course, even if it did make
the API a lot uglier IMHO.  I liked the var-args feature for specifying the
interfaces/classes that the proxy should support and I would rather use the
core JDK Executor class rather than the one from the "concurrent" API.  Oh
well.

 

James

 

-----Original Message-----
From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:rdonkin@apache.org] 
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:28 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Moving Proxy to Commons Proper

 

hi james

 

IMO it would be better to make this a proposal. quite often, small

changes will are needed and discussion required. votes tend to get a

little confused and lost when that happens. usually, it's a bit cleaner

to make a proposal then move to a vote when there are no remaining

objections.

 

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 08:17 -0400, James Carman wrote:

> All,

>  

> Outside projects (currently my Syringe project and the "Crispy" project at

> sourceforge) are beginning to want to use Commons Proxy, but are finding
it

> difficult since it's in the sandbox and no releases are available.  I

> believe Proxy's API is close to being ready for a release candidate.

> Currently, I don't have any other bright ideas for it, but I'm open to

> suggestions.  Moving it to the proper will help us prepare it for an

> official release.

 

being ready for an official release is one of my personal criteria for

promotion (so that's good). part of being ready is demonstrating to the

community that the committers know how to cut commons releases. 

 

might i suggest that you cut an example release candidate and upload it

to your apache home directory. not only will this speed the time taken

to cut the first release (we can spot any problems now rather than

later) but it will also give us a better idea of where proxy actually is

right now.

 

- robert


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message