commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rahul Akolkar <>
Subject [SCXML][ALL] Thoughts on checkstyle report
Date Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:51:34 GMT
After attending to most of the qualms checkstyle had with the SCXML
code base, the remaining cruft is posted here [ ] *time
sensitive URL*

The vast majority falls in three categories:

1) Missing header / line does not match expected header - Which my
eyes style out of the checkstyle report ;-)

2) 'foo' hides a field - Inside side-effect free setters, where these
reports come from, this does not bother me.

3) Method 'bar' not designed for extension - Outside the SCXML Java
object model (where the type hierarchies imply certain semantics of
execution for the state machine), I haven't chased these down.

Thoughts, anyone?


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message