commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Kitching <>
Subject Re: [jelly] distribution format
Date Tue, 14 Jun 2005 01:40:53 GMT
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 13:12 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
> And
> the lack of bugzilla entries and user/development questions also implies
> that Jelly is fine as-is.

umm .. the lack of Bugzilla entries is probably because Jelly uses
Jira :-(.

Jira has quite a few bug entries (73).

It looks like there are quite a few bugs that really should be addressed
before a 1.0 release because it looks to me like they have the potential
to change Jelly behaviour - after a 1.0 release, that would mean going
to 2.0 I believe.

On the other hand, we need to consider that Jelly have any regular
maintainers. And if Maven2 moves to Marmalade (
instead of Jelly the developer pool will drop even further. So saying no
to a 1.0 release now may mean saying no to a 1.0 release forever -
despite the fact that Jelly is clearly useable for many purposes right
now. I don't know which is the best choice...



To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message