commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23815] - [beanutils] PropertyUtils.getNestedProperty() doesn't allow getXxxx on Map-Instances any longer
Date Sat, 28 May 2005 04:35:51 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23815>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23815





------- Additional Comments From skitching@apache.org  2005-05-28 06:35 -------
Actually, it occurred to me that this problem only occurs for classes where the
target bean implements Map. But in that case the target bean can *overide* the
get/set methods to access its local properties if it wants. It seems entirely
appropriate to me that the target class should make this decision, ie a bean
class that implements Map should choose whether it wants to be a pure Map, or a
normal bean "backed by a map for missing properties".

The only issue is backwards support for the behaviour of beanutils as included
in Struts 1.0. And I'm puzzled about this. I've downloaded struts 1.0.2 and it
mentions nothing about being dependent on beanutils. Nor can I see any reference
to the "Struts Bean Tags" stuff that provides <bean:write>. As far as I can see,
that first appeared in Struts 1.1. But I'm not a Struts user, so I might have
got confused. Can someone clear this up?


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message