commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <>
Subject Re: [PGP] choose another name?
Date Thu, 19 May 2005 15:21:07 GMT
--- Brett Porter <> wrote:
> ok, so commons-openpgp would be ok. I'm still
> thinking commons-crypto is
> a good name, but I'll be happy with either. It can
> always be changed
> later when it is expanded I guess.

I like commons-crypto better personally though I won't
die over commons-openpgp.

> As far as I understand, we're only aiming for
> something that wraps
> bouncycastle and/org cryptix (which, at least in
> BC's case from my
> experience,  already does the crypto stuff very
> well) that is at a
> higher level and isolated from the provider's own
> API. We're just
> signing some deployments here, for now :)

I _want_ en/decryption support as well.  Also, I see
no reason not to provide a backing library that calls
a gpg executable.  This is GPL-kosher AFAIK (right?).


> Cheers,
> Brett

Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message