commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <robertburrelldon...@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject Re: [logging] J2EE Spec and classloader order (WAS: requirements and static binding)
Date Thu, 19 May 2005 21:23:46 GMT
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 11:36 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> Branching this discussion off, as I realize my
> previous post forked a thread.
> 
> --- Simon Kitching <skitching@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 23:37 -0700, Brian Stansberry
> > wrote:
> > > A few semi-random points on parent-first vs.
> > > parent-last classloading:
> > > 
> > > 1) EJBs, EARs and other non-webapp J2EE
> > deployments
> > > typically use parent-first loading.  I'd thought
> > JBoss
> > > offered a deployment descriptor option that
> > allowed
> > > the deployer to choose parent-last, but I was
> > > mistaken.  Too bad; I was hoping the scope of the
> > "if
> > > you want control, use parent-last classloading"
> > > approach would apply.
> > 
> > Well, if the EJB spec is designed to prevent EJBs
> > from overriding jars
> > present in the parent classloader, who are we to
> > argue?
> > 
> 
> Sorry, didn't "cross-pollinate" between a discussion I
> was having on the JBoss forum and here.  I briefly
> looked at the J2EE and EJB specs and didn't see
> anything that *required* parent-first.  It really
> doesn't say anything about it at all.  A comment by
> Scott Stark at JBoss implies the same.
> 
> For the JBoss forum discussion, please see: 
> 
> http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=63520

i'd be interested to find out how the type conflict arises

- robert


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message