Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 12:42:36 -0400
Message-ID: <2B64219028BBFF48B3CC957EF10B58FE726CB3@ns1018.SSSI.seagull.nl>
Thread-Topic: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release
Thread-Index: AcVDq3a2OXQGHkOtRLaa6hzfdpIi2wAiYuNg
From: "Gary Gregory" <ggregory@seagullsoftware.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>,
	"Steven Caswell" <steven.caswell@gmail.com>,
	"Henri Yandell" <flamefew@gmail.com>

Ant knows how to use JAVA_HOME, I use "set JAVA_HOME=3D..." and run Ant
after that. That's how I building with Ant b/w 1.3.1 and 1.4.2.

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:steven.caswell@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2005 5:13 PM
To: Henri Yandell
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] VOTE 2.1 release

I think the problem is that there is more than just the JAVA_HOME and
PATH=20
to worry about. There are some registry setting that get changed,=20
specifically a setting that indicates the installed version. I'll just
wait=20
until tomorrow and do the RC2 build at work on a Unix box. I've gotten=20
everything else done on my local Windows (site build, jdiff, etc.) so=20
installing 1.2 and doing the binary build on Unix shouldn't be too much=20
trouble.

On 4/17/05, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Write yourself tiny .bat scripts which adjust PATH and JAVA_HOME?
>=20
> Should be as applicable on Windows as Linux. Different users is
> another possiiblity.
>=20
> As long as you add the new PATH entry at the front each time, it
> should find that one first.
>=20
> Hope that helps,
>=20
> Hen
>=20
> On 4/17/05, Steven Caswell <steven.caswell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Is there a convenient way to install both JDK 1.4 and 1.2 on a
Windows
> > system and switch between the two for building the 1.4 maven site
and=20
> the
> > 1.2 ant binaries? Or do I need to different systems with one of that
> > installed on each?
> >
> > TIA.
> >
> >
> > On 4/17/05, Phil Steitz <phil.steitz@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/17/05, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Unsure. I thought I was committed, so things like the overview
were
> > > > probably missed.
> > > >
> > > > I need to take the car in on Monday, so am spending a lot of the
> > > > weekend getting next weeks work done in advance :)
> > > >
> > > > Maybe Steve would like to knock out an RC2?
> > > >
> > > > The only thing that's peculiar to my setup is that I have the
JDiff
> > > > stuff setup with scripts instead of trying to do it through
Maven.
> > > > Legacy mainly.
> > > >
> > > > Important to get the JDK 1.2 vs 1.4 stuff right. Namely run
Maven
> > > > under 1.4 and Ant under 1.2. Use the binaries from Ant and get
the
> > > > rest (src, site) from Maven.
> > >
> > > Can someone (gently) enlighten me as to why it is better to build
the
> > > release binaries using 1.2? IIRC, for 2.0 we tested builds with
1.2,
> > > but make the release binaries using 1.4.
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steven Caswell
> > steven.caswell@gmail.com
> >
> > Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org
>=20


--=20
Steven Caswell
steven.caswell@gmail.com

Take back the web - http://www.mozilla.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org