commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33926] - [configuration] The Iterator returned by getKeys() should support remove()
Date Wed, 06 Apr 2005 18:28:26 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33926>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33926





------- Additional Comments From oliver.heger@t-online.de  2005-04-06 20:28 -------
Well, if copying the keys is a problem, the iterator returned by
AbstractConfiguration could work in a "deferred mode", i.e. as long as remove()
is not called, the wrapped iterator is directly accessed. The first call to
remove will copy all remaining keys into an internal collection, which is then
iterated.

Adding the clearProperty() logic to the iterator will not only lead to "smelly"
code, this is also something that simply gets forgotten when implementing
another Configuration class.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message