Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  b=yoaNfg8BQ+9ZmXv3huVfwGJr1QXW1e/BHQWxI8wyS/ZtAltRRROdtsGqZ4c4016l/LJmBJOGD6+j+FKhLJNPOL2cR9JUKi/u7hGOxRRXycwu/fSE7UnQN3vWq2FjZax0dshtyBl8N5bY7Eqf8Pqn/LqIf09jqKJoALVHMRy35Vo=
  ;
Message-ID: <20050308073512.35411.qmail@web90003.mail.scd.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 23:35:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Brian Stansberry <bes_commons_dev@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [logging] distribution packaging
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <1110236630.2345.98.camel@knossos.elmet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

--- robert burrell donkin
<robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> (new thread on packaging)
> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 05:34, Brian Stansberry wrote:
> > What I've found is documented at
> >
> >
http://xnet.wanconcepts.com/jcl/furtherAnalysis.html.
> 
> 
> we need to take a longer look into repackaging. i
> didn't expect that
> altering the distributions would work so well. 

I was a little surprised myself, which is why I wanted
to follow Ceki's good example and publish test cases
that could easily be verified (or debunked) by others.

> i'd definitely be willing
> to review patches if someone wants to volunteer to
> alter the build,
> create some good test cases and write up some
> documentation. 

I'd be happy to take that on if a consensus is reached
that repackaging is the way to go.  Might take me a
bit of time though, as I'm fairly swamped.
 
> i'd always suspected that static binding was the
> only solution for
> several difficult cases (but using byte code
> engineering rather than
> selective compilation as used in UGLI). the sticking
> point for this (and
> many other cases i'd like to be able to address) is
> that LogFactory is
> too complex and too tightly coupled to a container
> environment. 

Yep, all the tests cases basically simulate different
types of containers.  But hopefully we're close to
getting the container use cases clean.

Brian

> 
> - robert
> 
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 


__________________________________ 
Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! 
Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web 
http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org