Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22345 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2005 12:47:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2005 12:47:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 17275 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2005 12:47:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17237 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2005 12:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17224 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2005 12:47:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from ddsl-216-68-127-190.fuse.net (HELO carmanconsulting.com) (216.68.127.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 04:47:12 -0800 Received: from carmani600m ([192.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by carmanconsulting.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2OCl2QT009964 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:47:10 -0500 From: "James Carman" To: "'Jakarta Commons Developers List'" Subject: [collections] [VOTE] Bug 33190... Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 07:46:49 -0500 Organization: Carman Consulting, Inc. Message-ID: <003301c5306f$8eb2e900$8753058f@carmani600m> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Could we come to some consensus on this item in Bugzilla? I have = already put my $0.02 in as a comment. But, this one is somewhat easy either way = we go with it. If the decision is to not include it, then that's a = no-brainer. If we decide to include it, then it's not much effort to do that either. But, a decision has to be made. I'm -1 on including it, as I don't = think it's a valid approach or all that common. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org