commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Craig McClanahan <>
Subject Re: [chain] steps towards 1.0.1 release?
Date Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:28:00 GMT
The basic idea of catching ChainServlet up is sound, and I agree it
should be done before the next release.  I'll be able to look at this,
but not until tonight.

To reduce confusion, I'd also like to think about deprecating the
original configuration mechanism (the one that preceeded
CatalogFactory and supported only one catalog) -- although we'd still
have to leave it in for backwards compatibility, of course.  What do
you think?


On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 05:59:50 -0600, Joe Germuska <> wrote:
> At 11:21 PM -0800 3/16/05, Craig McClanahan wrote:
> >I'm fine with a 1.1 designation (there is a quite useful enhancement
> >here) and will review the code and docs tomorrow for any useful
> >updates.
> Craig, maybe you can have a look at
> It was a response to Howard Lin's questions last week about using
> ChainProcessor.  As I got deeper into the code, the problem looked
> less dire than I had thought, but I was leary about committing the
> changes without some attention from someone who had either used the
> ChainProcessor or who was in a better position to test them out.
> All of the other[chain] tickets in Bugzilla are enhancements.
> Joe
> --
> Joe Germuska
> "Narrow minds are weapons made for mass destruction"  -The Ex
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message