commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dion Gillard <>
Subject Re: [beanutils] attention beanutils committers!
Date Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:56:01 GMT
The first one seems reasonable, and I agree with your comment on
possible issue with Object[] and Class[] clashing.

On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:18:13 +1300, Simon Kitching <> wrote:
> Hi All,
> It would seem that the number of active beanutils committers has shrunk
> significantly.
> Firstly, is there anyone who can spare 10 minutes to review these two
> patches, and give a +1 (or not) to their inclusion in beanutils? I think
> both are appropriate, but as I'm not a regular beanutils committer I
> would like someone to second this.
> The submitter of the patches seems keen, and I think we should try to
> encourage that sort of thing! If no-one steps up to offer an opinion I
> will assume *I'm* the new beanutils maintainer team and commit the patch
> (well, once a few minor issues have been addressed).
> Sorry I can't provide a mail-archive link to the email threads on
> commons-dev in which these patches were discussed; MARC does not appear
> to be working at the moment.
> I have also noticed that the number of outstanding bugzilla entries for
> beanutils is growing; the poor library is looking a little neglected. I
> think it would be nice if people could spare a little time to address
> these. I'm happy to be one of them, but would feel lonely doing it all
> on my own.
> Note that I'm going to be away for three weeks very shortly, and don't
> know if I'll have internet access. I wanted to draw some attention to
> these items before I left..
> Cheers,
> Simon
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message