Edgar Poce wrote:
> I think org.apache.commons.vfs.provider.AbstractRandomAccessContent
> should be renamed to AbstractRandomAccessContentRO (ReadOnly) because,
> as stated in the javadocs, it's a superclass only suitable for read
> only implementations. In
> o.a.c.vfs.provider.AbstractRandomAccessContent methods I'd like to
> find methods with common functionality to all providers, e.g. type
> conversion both for reading and writing.
Thanks for the suggestion, but this class was meant to be the superclass
for all RandomAccesContent implementation - at first with some help for
ReadOnly implementations and later for any implementation. I just have
to work out their similaries.
> btw, great product!
Thanks!
Ciao,
Mario
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
|