commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@btopenworld.com>
Subject Re: [collections] [VOTE] Bug 33190...
Date Thu, 24 Mar 2005 14:03:36 GMT
--- James Carman <james@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> Could we come to some consensus on this item in
> Bugzilla?  I have already
> put my $0.02 in as a comment.  But, this one is
> somewhat easy either way we
> go with it.  If the decision is to not include it,
> then that's a no-brainer.
> If we decide to include it, then it's not much
> effort to do that either.
> But, a decision has to be made.  I'm -1 on including
> it, as I don't think
> it's a valid approach or all that common.

Actually, I think it could be useful as a technique,
if we put out of our minds the validness of the given
use case.

If we did include it, it would essentially be a
CallClosureWhenCompleteIterator.

So, I'm +0.5. However on coding matters, any -1 is a
veto, so it won't happen if you -1.

Stephen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message