commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33825] - [lang] PATCH-New methods for DateUtils
Date Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:55:29 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33825>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33825





------- Additional Comments From bayard@apache.org  2005-03-06 19:55 -------
Wondering if this goes far enough.

Looking at the org.apache.commons.lang.math.*Range stuff the other day, I was
wondering if we should have a DateRange class that supports more than just hours
and minutes.

I also really dislike the int approach to the time; 2359 etc. Feels very unwieldly.

Should this concept of 'is in range' be applicable to the concept of a Duration,
or to JODA's concept of an Interval, Duration or Period? How far do we then want
to go into this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message