commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Sgarlata <>
Subject Re: [Jexl & BeanUtils] Why not extend Jexl or beanutils to match same map syntax ?
Date Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:31:19 GMT

The Morph framework ( supports either syntax 
out-of-the box.  Morph had its first beta release yesterday.

For a comparison of Morph to JEXL, see

For a comparison of Morph to BeanUtils, see



marc & lan wrote:
> Hi.
> This message is for jexl and beanutils folks.
> I'm using both of them, as many people I presume.
> Both of them share _almost_ the same syntax but for mapped access.
> Jexl uses square brackets as "[key]" and beanUtils uses 
> parentheses ""
> To my opinion it could be a good idea to extends jexl to uses also 
> beanutils parentheses syntax.
> What are you thinking about this ?
> Marc DeXeT

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message