commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mario Ivankovits <>
Subject Re: [vfs] proposal: MemoryFS
Date Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:50:26 GMT
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:
> Could you explain the tradeoffs between putting the RAM set into the 
> URI v. as an option to the configuration builder?
Your solution is just as good. But you have to ensure you really handle 
it like the "host" within the other filesystems. The point is VFS has to 
create a new filesystem instance for every "set", else all "sets" are 
tied together in one filesystem and maybe never get garbage-collected as 
someone might use a RamFS in an long time work.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message