commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <>
Subject Re: [vfs] proposal: MemoryFS
Date Sat, 29 Jan 2005 03:39:31 GMT
B. K. Oxley (binkley) wrote:
> I'm thinking of implementing a "memory filesystem" with VFS as a 
> demonstration.  The demo filesystems for local files and URLs are fine 
> and good, but they are not very pedagogic for implementing virtual 
> features.  For example, they do not do much with attributes.  A 
> filesystem implementation which stored everything in memory would permit 
> demonstration of the full range of features for VFS.

Towards this end, I've started a RamFileName, et al.  Looking at my 
proposal, I realize that MemoryFS is a lousy name.  :-)  RamFS is a much 
better name: it is more clear (could MemoryFS refer to persistence 
instead of computer memory), and matches the names of existing RAM 
filesystem (on Linux).

How's this for a scheme?


Where <path> is a regular Unix-style path and ram:/ refers to the root 
set of the RAM filesystem.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message