commons-dev mailing list archives: December 2004

Site index · List index
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
cvs commit: jakarta-commons/chain/src/test/org/apache/commons/chain/impl CatalogFactoryBaseTestCase.java
mart...@apache.org   cvs commit: jakarta-commons/chain/src/test/org/apache/commons/chain/impl CatalogFactoryBaseTestCase.java Thu, 09 Dec, 05:23
craig...@apache.org   cvs commit: jakarta-commons/chain/src/test/org/apache/commons/chain/impl CatalogFactoryBaseTestCase.java Fri, 31 Dec, 02:28
Matthias Kerkhoff (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (JELLY-172) util:properties locks the file forever Thu, 09 Dec, 08:52
Phil Steitz [Announcement] Commons Math 1.0 Released Thu, 09 Dec, 11:34
Matthias Kerkhoff (JIRA) [jira] Created: (JELLY-174) <threads:waitFor> does not use onlyWait as maximum wait time for thread groups Thu, 09 Dec, 11:46
Matthias Kerkhoff (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (JELLY-174) <threads:waitFor> does not use onlyWait as maximum wait time for thread groups Thu, 09 Dec, 11:57
Ryan Christanson (JIRA) [jira] Created: (JELLY-175) patch for jelly-tags-interaction Thu, 09 Dec, 17:03
Ryan Christanson (JIRA) [jira] Updated: (JELLY-175) patch for jelly-tags-interaction Thu, 09 Dec, 17:03
[logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?
Richard Sitze   [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 20:21
Matt Sgarlata     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 20:40
simon       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 00:29
matthew.hawthorne     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 20:43
David Graham     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 21:29
simon       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 00:29
Noel J. Bergman     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 21:42
Martin Cooper     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 22:52
simon       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 23:18
robert burrell donkin         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:38
Matt Sgarlata       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 03:29
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 23:26
Richard Sitze     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 23:29
Emmanuel Bourg     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 23:53
David Graham     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 00:40
Paulo Gaspar       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 19:03
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:39
Richard Sitze     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 02:04
Richard Sitze     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 02:39
Richard Sitze     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 02:39
Henning P. Schmiedehausen     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 10:34
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 19:06
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:40
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 20:15
Paulo Gaspar       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 11 Dec, 01:25
Noel J. Bergman     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 11 Dec, 02:24
Simon Kitching       RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 11 Dec, 04:07
Noel J. Bergman         RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 03:10
Matt Sgarlata           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 16:44
Ceki Gülcü             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 17:34
Matt Sgarlata             Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Sun, 19 Dec, 23:59
Ceki Gülcü               Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Mon, 20 Dec, 13:54
Matt Sgarlata               Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Mon, 20 Dec, 14:18
Ceki Gülcü                 Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Mon, 20 Dec, 15:17
Matt Sgarlata                   Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Mon, 20 Dec, 15:41
Ceki Gülcü                     Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Mon, 20 Dec, 17:28
Henning P. Schmiedehausen                       Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Tue, 21 Dec, 08:04
Ceki Gülcü                         Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Tue, 21 Dec, 10:44
Simon Kitching                       Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Sun, 26 Dec, 00:25
Matt Sgarlata                         Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Sun, 26 Dec, 04:50
Matt Sgarlata             Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class Sun, 19 Dec, 23:59
Paulo Gaspar       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 11 Dec, 14:33
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:44
David Graham     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 11 Dec, 19:04
Simon Kitching       RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 11 Dec, 20:59
Richard Sitze     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 13 Dec, 17:33
robert burrell donkin     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:37
Henning P. Schmiedehausen       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 21:06
Richard Sitze         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 21:21
Simon Kitching           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 00:23
Matt Sgarlata             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 00:53
Simon Kitching               Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 04:18
Matt Sgarlata                 Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 05:04
Richard Sitze                 Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 16:51
Henning P. Schmiedehausen                   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 18:20
Henning P. Schmiedehausen             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 08:29
robert burrell donkin             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 22:38
Henning P. Schmiedehausen           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 08:50
robert burrell donkin         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 23:02
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 20:10
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 22:19
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 20:10
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 22:19
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 16:51
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 18:09
David Graham     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 19:59
Curt Arnold     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 23:34
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 17 Dec, 01:56
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 19:25
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 17 Dec, 01:56
Curt Arnold       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 17 Dec, 05:13
Emmanuel Bourg       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 17 Dec, 11:51
Chris Lambrou       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 17 Dec, 22:32
Simon Kitching         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 10:58
Matt Sgarlata           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 16:25
robert burrell donkin             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 18:26
robert burrell donkin         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 14:59
Noel J. Bergman     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 03:10
Noel J. Bergman     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 03:10
Noel J. Bergman     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 03:10
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 18:24
Curt Arnold       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 20:52
robert burrell donkin         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 20 Dec, 22:03
Ceki Gülcü           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 20 Dec, 22:21
robert burrell donkin             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 20 Dec, 23:01
Ceki Gülcü               Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 10:56
robert burrell donkin         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 20 Dec, 22:13
Tim O'Brien         RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 20 Dec, 23:13
robert burrell donkin           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 10:29
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 20 Dec, 21:31
Henning P. Schmiedehausen         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 08:07
robert burrell donkin           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 13:27
Henning P. Schmiedehausen             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 14:19
robert burrell donkin               [logging] roadmap? [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?] Tue, 21 Dec, 19:31
Ceki Gülcü         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 15:05
robert burrell donkin           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 18:51
Ceki Gülcü             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 20:24
robert burrell donkin               [OT][logging] politics [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?] Tue, 21 Dec, 22:56
Ceki Gülcü                 Re: [OT][logging] politics [WAS Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?] Wed, 22 Dec, 10:53
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 20:18
Curt Arnold       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 21:19
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 20:18
Scott Deboy     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 23:07
robert burrell donkin       Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 13:39
Matt Sgarlata         Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 14:04
Richard Sitze           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 18:08
Matt Sgarlata             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 20:01
robert burrell donkin           Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 19:33
Matt Sgarlata             Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 19:47
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sun, 19 Dec, 23:34
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sun, 19 Dec, 23:34
Scott Deboy     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 16:52
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 18:08
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 18:08
Richard Sitze     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Tue, 21 Dec, 22:07
Richard Sitze   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 23:16
Simon Kitching   RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 01:23
Simon Kitching     RE: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Fri, 10 Dec, 01:39
robert burrell donkin     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:39
robert burrell donkin   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:39
Richard Sitze   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 20:22
Ceki Gülcü   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 13:41
Ceki Gülcü     Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 14:49
Richard Sitze   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 16:51
David Graham   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 16 Dec, 17:47
Richard Sitze   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Sat, 18 Dec, 20:18
Ceki Gülcü   Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Mon, 27 Dec, 23:52
Richard Sitze [logging] Common Logging 2.0? EnterpriseLogFactory.java Thu, 09 Dec, 20:28
Niall Pemberton   Re: [logging] Common Logging 2.0? EnterpriseLogFactory.java Thu, 09 Dec, 21:17
Richard Sitze [logging] Common Logging 2.0? EnterpriseLog.java Thu, 09 Dec, 20:28
[Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FrontPage
commons-...@jakarta.apache.org   [Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FrontPage Thu, 09 Dec, 20:57
commons-...@jakarta.apache.org   [Jakarta Commons Wiki] Updated: FrontPage Sat, 18 Dec, 18:29
Daniel Florey AW: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 21:46
Richard Sitze   Re: AW: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Thu, 09 Dec, 22:52
robert burrell donkin     Re: AW: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0? Wed, 15 Dec, 19:37
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] New: - Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap Thu, 09 Dec, 21:51
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] - [beanutils] Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] - [beanutils] Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap Thu, 09 Dec, 22:07
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] - [beanutils] Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap Thu, 09 Dec, 22:10
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] - Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] - Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap Thu, 09 Dec, 22:10
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32614] - Change the properties HashMap of the RequestUtils.populate method to a LinkedHashMap Thu, 09 Dec, 22:11
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] New: - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:44
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:46
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:46
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:47
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:49
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:49
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:50
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - [logging] Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - [logging] Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:52
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32618] - [logging] Enterprise Commons Logging : Globalization & more Thu, 09 Dec, 22:52
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32619] New: - Minor tweak to fix of bug # 26616 Thu, 09 Dec, 23:14
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32619] - [lang] Minor tweak to fix of bug # 26616
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32619] - [lang] Minor tweak to fix of bug # 26616 Thu, 09 Dec, 23:55
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32619] - [lang] Minor tweak to fix of bug # 26616 Tue, 28 Dec, 23:19
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32423] - [net] FTP component fails to throw error when ftp site fails to list contents properly
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32423] - [net] FTP component fails to throw error when ftp site fails to list contents properly Fri, 10 Dec, 00:29
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32423] - [net] FTP component fails to throw error when ftp site fails to list contents properly Fri, 10 Dec, 10:12
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32623] New: - FTP component: FTPFile does not initialize miliseconds correctly Fri, 10 Dec, 00:39
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32623] - [net] FTP component: FTPFile does not initialize miliseconds correctly
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32623] - [net] FTP component: FTPFile does not initialize miliseconds correctly Fri, 10 Dec, 00:48
bugzi...@apache.org   DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32623] - [net] FTP component: FTPFile does not initialize miliseconds correctly Fri, 10 Dec, 10:10
Phil Steitz [math] R verification tests Fri, 10 Dec, 04:03
mart...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/chain/xdocs index.xml Fri, 10 Dec, 05:11
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32625] New: - [lang] Can't subclass EqualsBuilder because isEquals is private Fri, 10 Dec, 05:12
pste...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/math project.xml build.xml Fri, 10 Dec, 05:12
pste...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/distribution ExponentialDistributionTest.java Fri, 10 Dec, 05:16
pste...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/stat/regression SimpleRegressionTest.java Fri, 10 Dec, 05:18
pste...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/math/src/experimental/R - New directory Fri, 10 Dec, 05:44
pste...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/math/src/experimental/R README.txt binomialTestCases chiSquareTestCases exponentialTestCases hypergeometricTestCases normalTestCases poissonTestCases regressionTestCases testAll testFunctions Fri, 10 Dec, 05:47
d...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/util/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/util PropertiesTag.java Fri, 10 Dec, 06:25
d...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/jelly/jelly-tags/util/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/util suite.jelly Fri, 10 Dec, 06:26
dion gillard (JIRA) [jira] Resolved: (JELLY-172) util:properties locks the file forever Fri, 10 Dec, 06:32
Martin Cooper [ANNOUNCEMENT] Commons Chain 1.0 Released Fri, 10 Dec, 07:29
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32629] New: - Compress: TarInputStream.read() returns wrong values Fri, 10 Dec, 09:30
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32629] - [compress] TarInputStream.read() returns wrong values Fri, 10 Dec, 09:43
bugzi...@apache.org DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16394] - [validator] Enhance the IndexedListProperty to handle nested lists. Fri, 10 Dec, 10:32
cvs commit: jakarta-commons/transaction RELEASE-NOTES.txt
ozeigerm...@apache.org   cvs commit: jakarta-commons/transaction RELEASE-NOTES.txt Fri, 10 Dec, 12:58
ozeigerm...@apache.org   cvs commit: jakarta-commons/transaction RELEASE-NOTES.txt Tue, 14 Dec, 09:14
ozeigerm...@apache.org   cvs commit: jakarta-commons/transaction RELEASE-NOTES.txt Fri, 17 Dec, 00:33
ozeigerm...@apache.org cvs commit: jakarta-commons/transaction build.xml Fri, 10 Dec, 13:05
Message list« Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · Next »Thread · Author · Date
Box list
Jul 2014114
Jun 2014310
May 2014468
Apr 2014428
Mar 2014311
Feb 2014535
Jan 2014561
Dec 2013321
Nov 2013542
Oct 20131116
Sep 2013203
Aug 2013639
Jul 2013472
Jun 2013364
May 2013381
Apr 2013381
Mar 2013944
Feb 2013421
Jan 2013654
Dec 2012720
Nov 2012609
Oct 2012461
Sep 2012706
Aug 2012783
Jul 2012665
Jun 2012670
May 2012479
Apr 2012491
Mar 20121283
Feb 2012810
Jan 2012602
Dec 2011885
Nov 2011685
Oct 2011789
Sep 2011928
Aug 20111048
Jul 2011823
Jun 2011590
May 2011661
Apr 2011764
Mar 2011788
Feb 2011506
Jan 2011707
Dec 2010362
Nov 2010734
Oct 2010694
Sep 2010557
Aug 2010611
Jul 2010438
Jun 2010264
May 2010209
Apr 2010371
Mar 2010663
Feb 2010326
Jan 2010376
Dec 2009308
Nov 2009486
Oct 2009339
Sep 2009286
Aug 2009467
Jul 2009411
Jun 2009420
May 2009804
Apr 2009501
Mar 2009659
Feb 2009419
Jan 2009461
Dec 2008295
Nov 2008294
Oct 2008247
Sep 2008171
Aug 2008198
Jul 2008218
Jun 2008377
May 2008676
Apr 20081093
Mar 2008741
Feb 2008653
Jan 2008880
Dec 2007268
Nov 2007374
Oct 2007280
Sep 2007261
Aug 2007451
Jul 20071189
Jun 2007970
May 2007982
Apr 2007715
Mar 2007720
Feb 2007876
Jan 20071026
Dec 20061008
Nov 20061579
Oct 2006890
Sep 2006643
Aug 2006995
Jul 20061542
Jun 2006750
May 20061059
Apr 20061280
Mar 20061782
Feb 20061147
Jan 20061351
Dec 20051531
Nov 20051520
Oct 20051020
Sep 20051068
Aug 20051757
Jul 20051166
Jun 20051478
May 20051309
Apr 2005925
Mar 20051063
Feb 20051528
Jan 20051715
Dec 20041414
Nov 20041732
Oct 20041649
Sep 20042039
Aug 20041449
Jul 20041239
Jun 20041923
May 20041967
Apr 20041481
Mar 20042020
Feb 20041944
Jan 20041969
Dec 20031510
Nov 20032060
Oct 20032096
Sep 20032048
Aug 20031901
Jul 20031556
Jun 20031833
May 20031441
Apr 20031378
Mar 20031394
Feb 20031441
Jan 20032603
Dec 20021234
Nov 20021437
Oct 20022149
Sep 20021572
Aug 20022411
Jul 20022394
Jun 20021965
May 20021124
Apr 20021334
Mar 2002991
Feb 20021720
Jan 20021856
Dec 2001512
Nov 2001266
Oct 200119