commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <...@intermeta.de>
Subject Re: [logging] ECL: Log interface vs. abstract class
Date Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:04:34 GMT
Ceki =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=FClc=FC?= <ceki@qos.ch> writes:

>all the attempts  made at bridging X.25 and  TCP/IP, both well defined
>and  stable protocols,  have  failed miserably,  even  if both  stacks
>supposedly fit into layers 1-4 of the 7 layer OSI network model.

But X.25 and TCP/IP use two completely different paradigms ("always
deliver" vs. "best effort"). BTDTGTT.

This is like saying "a good football player should also be a good
basketball player, because both are games played with a ball".

If this is the level to which this discussion will degrade, it makes
no sense to discuss. You are (once again) comparing apples to
pears.

	Regards
		Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

What is more important to you...
   [ ] Product Security
or [ ] Quality of Sales and Marketing Support
              -- actual question from a Microsoft customer survey

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message