commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tim O'Brien" <tobr...@discursive.com>
Subject RE: [Vote] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2004 02:46:46 GMT
+1 for commons-sql to db.apache.org

And, I'd be +1 for moving commons-dbutils to db.apache.org 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Dudziak [mailto:tomdz@first.fhg.de] 
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:33 PM
> To: pmc@db.apache.org; Jakarta Project Management Committee 
> List; commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: [Vote] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)
> 
> (This is a repost from a vote that I started earlier today, 
> but where I did not include commons-dev. This omission has 
> been pointed out to me, and I agree that including 
> commons-dev is important, so I repost the vote hereby)
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to start a cross-vote (Jakarta PMC and commons-dev, 
> DB PMC) about moving the jakarta sandbox project commons-sql
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/sql/) over to 
> db.apache.org, for instance into the currently vacant 
> db-commons space (http://db.apache.org/commons/).
> 
> The reasons why we want to move commons-sql, are twofold:
> 
> * The two active committers (Martin Kalén and myself) are DB 
> comitters, but not comitters to another Jakarta project. As a 
> result we would rather not subscribe to 
> commons-dev/commons-user because very few mails there deal 
> with commons-sql (one or two per month). Also, db-commons 
> already has all setup'd (mailing lists, CVS space etc.), not 
> to mention that the exposure of the project would be much greater.
> 
> * No other Jakarta project that I'm aware of, uses 
> commons-sql. In contrast, OJB will do so (beginning with the 
> upcoming 1.1 version), and so it would be good to provide 
> access to the commons-sql repository to the OJB comitters. 
> The same might also be true for Torque as commons-sql's 
> functionality overlaps in some parts with Torque 
> functionality, which opens up an opportunity to combine this 
> functionality into a base component which both OJB and Torque 
> could use.
> 
> Please post your opinion until next wednesday, the 15th of 
> december, and please reply to all recipients.
> 
> 
> Votes cast so far:
> 
> +1 Brian McCallister
> +1 Henri Yandell
>     (though with objections regarding moving it into db-commons,
>      http://db.apache.org/commons)
> +1 Henning Schmiedehausen
> 
> 
> regards,
> Thomas Dudziak
> 
> 
> PS: I'm not sure if this is the correct procedure, but I 
> thought a vote 
> is at least a good way to get the ball rolling, so to speak. 
> If there is 
> a defined way to handle movement of projects, then please let me know.
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message