commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daniel F. Savarese" <>
Subject Re: Jakarta Commons Structure rehashed
Date Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:47:23 GMT

In message <>, "Noel J. Bergman" w
>We don't version Commons as a single component, and I don't know that we
>want to force everyone to always take every single component.  Someone
>wanting to build all of Commons is not the norm.

I didn't want to reopen the issue.  I was merely making an ancillary comment.
However, the flatter layout does not version Commons as a single component.
It's all dictated by the procedures one follows.  There's no difference
between checking out
or between tagging

The difference is all in one's head.  Whether one is uncomfortable with
a tag tree filled with lots of tags is a matter of personal preference
and one I understand.  But conceptually, and in terms of release procedures
and script writing, there's no technical difference (everything is still
versioned separately).  Anyway, please stop commenting on this.  I was
rambling late at night without having read the thread from its start and
I apologize for the distraction given the merely observational nature of
my comment.  I'm a happy camper with the currently proposed layout.
The intent of my email was to offer a suggestion regarding the mention
of symbolic links, assuming I understood what was being discussed.


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message