commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Rall <...@collab.net>
Subject RE: [Vote] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:27:42 GMT
+1

On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 21:46 -0500, Tim O'Brien wrote:
> +1 for commons-sql to db.apache.org
> 
> And, I'd be +1 for moving commons-dbutils to db.apache.org 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Dudziak [mailto:tomdz@first.fhg.de] 
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 2:33 PM
> > To: pmc@db.apache.org; Jakarta Project Management Committee 
> > List; commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: [Vote] Moving commons-sql to db.apache.org (repost)
> > 
> > (This is a repost from a vote that I started earlier today, 
> > but where I did not include commons-dev. This omission has 
> > been pointed out to me, and I agree that including 
> > commons-dev is important, so I repost the vote hereby)
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I'd like to start a cross-vote (Jakarta PMC and commons-dev, 
> > DB PMC) about moving the jakarta sandbox project commons-sql
> > (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/sql/) over to 
> > db.apache.org, for instance into the currently vacant 
> > db-commons space (http://db.apache.org/commons/).
> > 
> > The reasons why we want to move commons-sql, are twofold:
> > 
> > * The two active committers (Martin Kalén and myself) are DB 
> > comitters, but not comitters to another Jakarta project. As a 
> > result we would rather not subscribe to 
> > commons-dev/commons-user because very few mails there deal 
> > with commons-sql (one or two per month). Also, db-commons 
> > already has all setup'd (mailing lists, CVS space etc.), not 
> > to mention that the exposure of the project would be much greater.
> > 
> > * No other Jakarta project that I'm aware of, uses 
> > commons-sql. In contrast, OJB will do so (beginning with the 
> > upcoming 1.1 version), and so it would be good to provide 
> > access to the commons-sql repository to the OJB comitters. 
> > The same might also be true for Torque as commons-sql's 
> > functionality overlaps in some parts with Torque 
> > functionality, which opens up an opportunity to combine this 
> > functionality into a base component which both OJB and Torque 
> > could use.
> > 
> > Please post your opinion until next wednesday, the 15th of 
> > december, and please reply to all recipients.
> > 
> > 
> > Votes cast so far:
> > 
> > +1 Brian McCallister
> > +1 Henri Yandell
> >     (though with objections regarding moving it into db-commons,
> >      http://db.apache.org/commons)
> > +1 Henning Schmiedehausen
> > 
> > 
> > regards,
> > Thomas Dudziak
> > 
> > 
> > PS: I'm not sure if this is the correct procedure, but I 
> > thought a vote 
> > is at least a good way to get the ball rolling, so to speak. 
> > If there is 
> > a defined way to handle movement of projects, then please let me know.
> > 
> > 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message