Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16523 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2004 13:45:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Nov 2004 13:45:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5317 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2004 13:45:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5298 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2004 13:45:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 5253 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2004 13:45:01 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from devtech.com (HELO mail.devtech.com) (66.112.202.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 05:45:00 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.devtech.com (JAMES SMTP Server 2.2.1-dev) with SMTP ID 996 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:44:52 -0500 (EST) From: "Noel J. Bergman" To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Subject: RE: SVN repository structure (was Re: Volunteer for SVN migrationmanagement) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:44:51 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <1101678224.1028.6.camel@pcsimon> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Simon Kitching wrote: > If each subproject has a 'tags'/'branches' directory, then doesn't it > become impossible to check out the latest source of *all* the commons > projects without ending up with a copy of every branch of that project > ever made? You would check out the trunk for each component. The trunk/tags/branches structure is usually applied to each separately releasable entity. > I think the ability to get "the latest of commons" is important To a minority of people, IMO. Most are interested in the components they want to use. But, hey, SVN supports any of these organizations. --- Noel --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org