Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56100 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2004 22:08:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2004 22:08:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 80187 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2004 22:08:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 79902 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2004 22:08:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 79886 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2004 22:08:12 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk designates 195.188.213.4 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.188.213.4] (HELO smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk) (195.188.213.4) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:08:10 -0800 Received: from [10.0.0.2] ([82.38.65.173]) by smtp-out1.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:08:35 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20041118214136.36393.qmail@web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com> References: <20041118214136.36393.qmail@web90007.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: robert burrell donkin Subject: Re: logging: WeakHashtable Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 22:08:04 +0000 To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2004 22:08:35.0929 (UTC) FILETIME=[D001F490:01C4D0DF] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On 18 Nov 2004, at 21:41, Brian Stansberry wrote: >> custom LogFactory implementations are not very >> useful at the moment and >> so i'd be happy just to live with a note in the >> documentation about >> this limitation. >> > Sounds good. I'll put some thought to a good note, > although it might be a few days. Were you thinking in > the Javadoc, or somewhere else? a good note for the javadocs would be excellent. (the content will probably end up in the main documentation but where exactly needs a little thought.) - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org