Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 50498 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2004 16:36:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Nov 2004 16:36:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 99440 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2004 16:36:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 99362 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2004 16:36:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 99317 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2004 16:36:16 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of oliver.zeigermann@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.194 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.194] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.194) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:35:57 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so56101wri for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:35:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=rQeO4TvbICZWxm5OOaJ8Dw4yl4KiBKAWnxwniSNARtiH4anaLCUrt9vS8Q1AvoohyCJLxMlJgmWgdB42sS9I77+7MRo9DgAJyrQCaIcu3f2TsGoZ6wS0B0vxuRCneBTZPsZVEh05eOZ6VgiVoCxnHtQAaTv0ua64dg9lnXdW21Y= Received: by 10.54.45.5 with SMTP id s5mr1109568wrs; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:35:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.54 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:35:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9da4f452041119083525e7b0b2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:35:20 +0100 From: Oliver Zeigermann Reply-To: ozeigermann@apache.org To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Transaction to Commons Proper In-Reply-To: <9da4f45204111901265e073ea7@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <9da4f452041115094356a6b6d1@mail.gmail.com> <9da4f45204111808097a9361d1@mail.gmail.com> <9da4f452041118133619f67dff@mail.gmail.com> <9da4f45204111813431228c0ee@mail.gmail.com> <6C729DCB-39B2-11D9-905E-003065DC754C@blueyonder.co.uk> <9da4f45204111901265e073ea7@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N OK, do not know why but after a while I was just convinced: I will start a vote for a release candicate :) Oliver P.S.: Robert do you have any telepathic skills? ;) On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 10:26:18 +0100, Oliver Zeigermann wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:37:27 +0000, robert burrell donkin > wrote: > > same with the release. it's usually best to push out a release > > candidate first follow later by the release. the initial stage would be > > for someone to propose someone to act as release manager. > > Thanks for your continued help! > > I thought you become the release manager just by managing the release, > i.e. by doing it? Who would vote against someone who is willing to do > the non-fun administrative part? > > The Slide project uses the latest code of commons transaction and all > we can say it works as expected. Are there any reasons I do not see > for releasing a release candidate first? I mean I do not think right > now there are *that* many people that would use and thus check it > except the Slide project - which already has. > > Oliver > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org