Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31315 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 09:36:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 09:36:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 45489 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 09:36:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 45423 invoked by uid 500); 24 Nov 2004 09:36:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 45406 invoked by uid 99); 24 Nov 2004 09:36:55 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:36:52 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAO9alUr026364 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:36:47 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iAO9algr026362; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:36:47 +0100 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 10:36:47 +0100 Message-Id: <200411240936.iAO9algr026362@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32363] - extra byte in WRQ TFTP packet X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32363 ------- Additional Comments From rwinston@eircom.net 2004-11-24 10:36 ------- Now that I have actually looked at *both* RFCs ;-) I can see that there should be no change in the basic WRQ packet format from RFC 783 (on which the Commons::Net TFTP support is based): 2 bytes string 1 byte string 1 byte ------------------------------------------------ | Opcode | Filename | 0 | Mode | 0 | ------------------------------------------------ To RFC 1350: 2 bytes string 1 byte string 1 byte ------------------------------------------------ | Opcode | Filename | 0 | Mode | 0 | ------------------------------------------------ Have you tried with other RFC1350-compliant TFTP servers? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org