Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 25909 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 19:26:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 19:26:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 93744 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 19:25:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 93633 invoked by uid 500); 23 Nov 2004 19:25:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 93561 invoked by uid 99); 23 Nov 2004 19:25:57 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.87.106.226] (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:25:56 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iANJPbdN013473 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:25:37 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iANJPb4o013471; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:25:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:25:37 +0100 Message-Id: <200411231925.iANJPb4o013471@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32364] - HashCodeBuilder failed to generate unique hashcode X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32364 ------- Additional Comments From ggregory@seagullsw.com 2004-11-23 20:25 ------- This might be a case where the pattern: return new HashCodeBuilder(17,37). append(id). append(name). toHashCode(); is not a fit the domain object. If the "id" is unique you can just return the id for the hash code. The general case where the id AND the name need to be used as a primary key is going to be a problem for hash codes in general I think since we only have the int range. Anyone else care to comment please? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org