commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Nacho G. Mac Dowell" <igonza...@informa.es>
Subject Re: [Validator] Next Release
Date Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:21:59 GMT
It sounds good to me. If anything needs to be done for 1.1.4 I can help.

>Nacho,
>
>I had a quick look at #30955 and your patch and agree it looks like in needs
>fixing. At this point my itch is to just get a 1.1.4 version out which just
>includes bug #29452 so that I can then fix Struts. The fix for  bug #29452
>is v. simple and so the risk is low - bug # 30955 is more involved though
>and so IMO we should do that in the HEAD for the 1.2.0 version.
>
>I will try to find some time for it (unless someone beats me to it), but at
>this point I can't say when.
>
>Niall
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Nacho G. Mac Dowell" <igonzalez@informa.es>
>To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
>Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 9:31 AM
>Subject: Re: [Validator] Next Release
>
>
>  
>
>>I would like to address the importance of bug #30955
>>(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30955). Currently,
>>form definition processing isn't working properly. I was thinking of
>>changing severity to major to raise attention. Please do take a look and
>>tell me what you think.
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I doubt form inheritance has been tested completely since it hasn't been
>>>included in a release yet.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>I have extensively used form inheritance (I sent the patch). If you take
>>a close look at the changes involved you'd notice that special care was
>>taken to minimize impact on the rest of the code. I beleive form
>>inheritance could take Validator one step forward. If #30955 gets solved
>>it would even get more useful.
>>
>>I know that it is out of the scope of this mailing list but I would like
>>to say that using validator with struts is sort of painful when using
>>DynaValidatorForm. You have at least 4 hard coded parameter definitions
>>(struts-config.xml, validation.xml, the view and the action).  I have
>>seen that the preferred direction for validator is not form validation
>>but bean validation. It would be nice though if we could have a single
>>form definition with its simple commons-validator validations. What do
>>you think? Should I post this in the struts mailing list?
>>
>>Nacho G. Mac Dowell
>>
>>PD: I am using a different email address since it's the only one I can
>>use from work.
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message