commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32122] - Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?
Date Tue, 09 Nov 2004 09:20:23 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32122

Is there any way in Betwixt to validate the timestamp?

rdonkin@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME



------- Additional Comments From rdonkin@apache.org  2004-11-09 09:20 -------
Validation is an interesting issue :)

Some would say that the right place is in the bean

Some would say that the right way is to create a schema and validate against it

A few have suggested that bean -> xml mappers would be a good place to validate

Anyway, when I run similar xml against the CVS HEAD version, it throws a conversion exception.
I'd 
suggest looking at the mapping (are you mapping to a date field?) or upgrading to CVS HEAD
(if you're 
not using that already). Alternatively, reopen this report with a test case so that I can
reproduce the 
issue.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message