commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Don Brown <donald.br...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [chain] [VOTE] Release Chain 1.0
Date Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:28:21 GMT
But why not just release 1.0?  All but Matt seemed quite happy with
the current API, and as many folks including myself are using it in
production, I think we should stick to what has proven to work quite
nicely.

Don


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:57:07 -0500, Ted Husted <husted@apache.org> wrote:
> How about if we tag and roll a 0.2.0 "test build" now, so that we have a basis of comparison.
> 
> There are applications in play now that are using Chain as it is, and this would give
them something to use while we revisit the API.
> 
> I think the last thing we want to do is consider significant API changes without rolling
some type of release first.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> PS - Can we keep a "[chain]" marker in any threads, including [VOTE] threads? It helps
with the filtering.
> 
> -T.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message