commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Phil Steitz <p...@steitz.com>
Subject Re: [math] evaluate methods
Date Sun, 03 Oct 2004 20:01:06 GMT
Kim van der Linde wrote:
> Ok, my question then becomes: why this structure?
> 
> Cheers,
> Kim
> 

Probably the best answer here is "browse the archives."  Here are a couple 
of relevant threads:

http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org&msgId=756204
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org&by=thread&from=370577
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/BrowseList?listName=commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org&by=thread&from=371235

Suffice it to say that we decided to trade off the speed gains (which 
benchmarks actually showed were not really that big) from implementing 
array-based statistics in static methods for the flexibility / 
extensibility provided by the current setup.

Phil


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message