commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30855] - [lang] Additional constructor for EqualsBuilder and isEquals member access.
Date Mon, 18 Oct 2004 16:11:24 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30855

[lang] Additional constructor for EqualsBuilder and isEquals member access.





------- Additional Comments From ggregory@seagullsw.com  2004-10-18 16:11 -------
Should it not be up to the user to decide whether s/he wants less code
duplication vs. more processing? 

After all, "don't optimize before you measure, and then, don't optimize."

It sounds like we are telling users that we are performing a design time
optimization and not even providing the alt code pattern.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message