Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88333 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2004 02:00:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Sep 2004 02:00:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9991 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2004 01:58:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-commons-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9784 invoked by uid 500); 27 Sep 2004 01:58:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9692 invoked by uid 99); 27 Sep 2004 01:58:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.249.229.10] (HELO ricouer.tsdinc.steitz.com) (209.249.229.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:58:27 -0700 Received: from Lavoie.tsdinc.steitz.com ([209.249.229.4]) by ricouer.tsdinc.steitz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:58:22 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.200] ([130.13.71.41]) by Lavoie.tsdinc.steitz.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:58:15 -0400 Message-ID: <41574993.4060504@steitz.com> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:58:27 -0400 From: Phil Steitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [math] API changes for RC2 References: <20040926235516.14629.qmail@web50304.mail.yahoo.com> <41576D45.7080003@kimvdlinde.com> In-Reply-To: <41576D45.7080003@kimvdlinde.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2004 01:58:15.0934 (UTC) FILETIME=[73FC19E0:01C4A435] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Kim van der Linde wrote: > > > Al Chou wrote: > >> -0; question: do people really use the population version? When >> dealing with >> real-world data or any other distribution that is not known a priori, >> how could >> you, in good conscience? And if you know the distribution a priori, >> why would >> you need to compute statistics about it? > > > It depends if you want to minimise error or bias. This is a good point. Strike the "haughty" assertion in my last post -- i.e. it is not always "bogus" in practical terms to use a biased estimator. > We do use it at times, > just like we do change degrees-of-freedom (in many of our multivariate > analyses by 4 to be precise due to three modifications that take 1, 1, > and 2 degrees of freedom) in all kind of tests to correct for previous > calculations on the same data set. In some studies, the variance is > calculated relative to a set average, which become biased > the-other-way-around if you would use sample variances. Yes, this was the first case that I mentioned. > > Anyway, I reported these examples back because of the real life usage. > > Cheers, > > Kim > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org